Lifting calorie calculator

Most calculators give weight training a flat per-hour figure. This one works from the mechanical work you actually did — load times reps — blended with a time-based baseline.

Lifting Calorie Calculator

Weight training burns fewer calories per hour than cardio because most of a session is rest. A typical 60-minute session for an 82 kg lifter costs roughly 200 to 300 kcal. This estimate uses the actual mechanical work done, load multiplied by reps, blended with a time-based MET baseline rather than a flat per-hour figure.

Units

Optional — adds the MET baseline for rest periods.

54kcal burned

5 760 kg of volume

Mechanical work42 kJ
Work component86 kcal
MET baseline22 kcal
Total reps96
Assumed session length3 min
Method notes (3)
  • Hybrid estimate: a MET baseline for the session (metabolism that stays elevated through the sets and rests, plus stabilization/bracing) blended 50/50 with the mechanical work of the load moved (load × reps × bar path), so heavier, higher-volume sessions burn more than light ones of the same length.
  • Session minutes are derived from the number of sets (~3 min each, incl. rest), not the clock, so a session left "active" can't inflate the burn. Assumes ~0.5 m average bar path per rep. Expect ±30% individual variance.
  • Do NOT subtract from your daily target — activity_level already covers typical training.

Metric or imperial · runs the same code as the app · nothing is sent anywhere

How it works

The mechanical component comes from the work done against gravity: load × reps × bar path × g, converted to kilojoules and then to kilocalories at roughly 25% muscular efficiency, which is why a tonne of volume costs far fewer calories than people expect.

Because lifting is mostly rest, work alone under-counts a session. When you supply a bodyweight the estimate blends in a MET baseline over a session length derived from the set count, which is the figure most people recognise.

Common questions

Does lifting burn fewer calories than cardio?

During the session, usually yes, because the work is brief and most of the hour is rest. The case for lifting is what it does to lean mass and to your maintenance calories over months, not the burn on the day.

What about the afterburn?

Excess post-exercise oxygen consumption is real but small, typically well under a hundred calories for a normal session. It is not included here, and it does not change the arithmetic much.

The other calculators

These numbers are more useful when something tracks them.

The app runs this same maths against your logged weigh-ins, meals and sessions, so the figure updates itself instead of being a one-off.

Start free